Healthchecksvsjenkins
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | jenkins | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 26 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +123 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 32 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | jenkins-2.580.2 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
jenkins scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
jenkins ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
Healthchecks details →jenkins details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep jenkins, compare it with