hass-configuratorvsZot Registry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | Zot Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 2 923 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +121 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 12 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+121 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →Zot Registry details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep Zot Registry, compare it with