hass-configuratorvsThingsboard
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | Thingsboard | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 22 620 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +141 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 24 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v4.3.1.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Thingsboard scores 76/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
Thingsboard ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
If you want the quickest setup, hass-configurator is easier to run; Thingsboard needs more configuration.
Thingsboard is growing faster right now (+141 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →Thingsboard details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep Thingsboard, compare it with