hass-configuratorvsTailscale
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | Tailscale | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 38 291 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 449 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 14 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v1.104.4 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Tailscale scores 84/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
Tailscale ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
Tailscale is growing faster right now (+1 449 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →Tailscale details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep Tailscale, compare it with