hass-configuratorvsShields
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | Shields | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #6 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 27 332 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +126 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Shields scores 80/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
hass-configurator ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shields.
If you want the quickest setup, Shields is easier to run; hass-configurator needs more configuration.
Shields is growing faster right now (+126 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →Shields details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep Shields, compare it with