hass-configuratorvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 35 799 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +838 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 28 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+838 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with