hass-configuratorvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 1 034 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +64 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 21 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
If you want the quickest setup, hass-configurator is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with