hass-configuratorvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 61 548 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +486 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+486 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with