hass-configuratorvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 93 928 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +58 654 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 35 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 654 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →OmniVoice-Studio details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with