hass-configuratorvsNavidrome Music Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | Navidrome Music Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 24 422 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +647 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 15 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Navidrome Music Server scores 79/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
Navidrome Music Server ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; hass-configurator needs more configuration.
Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+647 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →Navidrome Music Server details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep Navidrome Music Server, compare it with