hass-configuratorvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 132 728 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 273 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 1468 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | b11982 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1468 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 273 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with