hass-configuratorvsHomarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | Homarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #4 of 44 in Dashboard |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 5 230 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +454 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 43 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v2.9.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Homarr scores 74/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
Homarr ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
If you want the quickest setup, Homarr is easier to run; hass-configurator needs more configuration.
Homarr is growing faster right now (+454 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →Homarr details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep Homarr, compare it with