GristvsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grist | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 12 017 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +158 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.7.21 · 9 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Grist scores 75/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Grist ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Wildbox.
If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
Grist is growing faster right now (+158 stars in 30 days).
Grist details →Wildbox details →
Swap a project
Keep Grist, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with