GristvsWazuh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grist | Wazuh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 12 010 | 17 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +159 | +493 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.7.21 · 9 Oct 2026 | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
Wazuh scores 80/100 against 75/100 for Grist, so it is the safer default.
Grist ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.
If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.
Wazuh is growing faster right now (+493 stars in 30 days).
Grist details →Wazuh details →
Swap a project
Keep Grist, compare it with
Keep Wazuh, compare it with