GristvsOpenScribe
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grist | OpenScribe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #4 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 12 011 | 223 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +160 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.7.21 · 9 Oct 2026 | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Grist scores 75/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.
Grist ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenScribe.
If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; OpenScribe needs more configuration.
Grist is growing faster right now (+160 stars in 30 days).
Grist details →OpenScribe details →
Swap a project
Keep Grist, compare it with
Keep OpenScribe, compare it with