graymattervsmemory-os
Two self-hosted Mem0 alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| graymatter | memory-os | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #38 of 125 in AI | #167 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 488 | 1 384 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +12 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.20.1 · 9 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
graymatter scores 53/100 against 40/100 for memory-os, so it is the safer default.
graymatter ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for memory-os.
If you want the quickest setup, graymatter is easier to run; memory-os needs more configuration.
memory-os is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).
graymatter details →memory-os details → All Mem0 alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep graymatter, compare it with
Keep memory-os, compare it with