memory-osvssupermemory
Two self-hosted Mem0 alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| memory-os | supermemory | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #167 of 209 in AI Agents | #19 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 384 | 31 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +599 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | server-v0.0.9 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supermemory scores 73/100 against 40/100 for memory-os, so it is the safer default.
supermemory ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for memory-os.
If you want the quickest setup, supermemory is easier to run; memory-os needs more configuration.
supermemory is growing faster right now (+599 stars in 30 days).
memory-os details →supermemory details → All Mem0 alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep memory-os, compare it with
Keep supermemory, compare it with