grafanavsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| grafana | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 77 582 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +689 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 53 | 0 |
| Latest release | v13.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
grafana scores 90/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
grafana ships more often: 53 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
grafana is growing faster right now (+689 stars in 30 days).
grafana details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep grafana, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with