gpt-researchervsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| gpt-researcher | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 69 in AI Chat | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 30 339 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +727 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 18 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 26 Sept 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
gpt-researcher scores 80/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for gpt-researcher.
If you want the quickest setup, gpt-researcher is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
gpt-researcher is growing faster right now (+727 stars in 30 days).
gpt-researcher details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep gpt-researcher, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with