gpt-researchervstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| gpt-researcher | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 69 in AI Chat | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 30 336 | 16 645 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +743 | +258 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 49 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 26 Sept 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
gpt-researcher scores 80/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for gpt-researcher.
If you want the quickest setup, gpt-researcher is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
gpt-researcher is growing faster right now (+743 stars in 30 days).
gpt-researcher details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep gpt-researcher, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with