gpt-researchervsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| gpt-researcher | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 69 in AI Chat | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 30 348 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +736 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 26 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
gpt-researcher scores 80/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
gpt-researcher ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
gpt-researcher is growing faster right now (+736 stars in 30 days).
gpt-researcher details →Traffic Source details →
Swap a project
Keep gpt-researcher, compare it with
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with