GotenbergvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gotenberg | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 13 472 | 6 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +316 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v8.39.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Gotenberg scores 77/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Gotenberg ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Gotenberg is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Gotenberg is growing faster right now (+316 stars in 30 days).
Gotenberg details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Gotenberg, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with