TypstvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Typst | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Publishing | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 56 870 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +141 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Typst details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Typst, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with