PaddleOCRvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 91 901 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +460 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+460 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with