GotenbergvsQMReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gotenberg | QMReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 13 470 | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +314 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 12 |
| Latest release | v8.39.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Gotenberg scores 77/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
Gotenberg ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for QMReader.
If you want the quickest setup, Gotenberg is easier to run; QMReader needs more configuration.
Gotenberg is growing faster right now (+314 stars in 30 days).
Gotenberg details →QMReader details →
Swap a project
Keep Gotenberg, compare it with
Keep QMReader, compare it with