go2rtcvsHass-MCP
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| go2rtc | Hass-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #63 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 14 522 | 351 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +276 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
go2rtc scores 74/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.
Hass-MCP ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.
If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; Hass-MCP needs more configuration.
go2rtc is growing faster right now (+276 stars in 30 days).
go2rtc details →Hass-MCP details →
Swap a project
Keep go2rtc, compare it with
Keep Hass-MCP, compare it with