Hass-MCPvsNavidrome Music Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Hass-MCP | Navidrome Music Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #63 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 351 | 24 414 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +656 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 15 |
| Latest release | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Navidrome Music Server scores 80/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.
Navidrome Music Server ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Hass-MCP.
If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; Hass-MCP needs more configuration.
Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+656 stars in 30 days).
Hass-MCP details →Navidrome Music Server details →
Swap a project
Keep Hass-MCP, compare it with
Keep Navidrome Music Server, compare it with