glusterfsvsSyncthing
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| glusterfs | Syncthing | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 89 845 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +963 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.7 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Syncthing scores 90/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.
Syncthing ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.
If you want the quickest setup, Syncthing is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.
Syncthing is growing faster right now (+963 stars in 30 days).
glusterfs details →Syncthing details →
Swap a project
Keep glusterfs, compare it with
Keep Syncthing, compare it with