DockerRegistryvsglusterfs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DockerRegistry | glusterfs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Container Registry | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 10 666 | 5 266 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.1.2 · 24 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
DockerRegistry scores 74/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.
DockerRegistry ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.
If you want the quickest setup, DockerRegistry is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.
DockerRegistry details →glusterfs details →
Swap a project
Keep DockerRegistry, compare it with
Keep glusterfs, compare it with