glusterfsvsMeshery
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| glusterfs | Meshery | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #2 of 7 in Kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 12 073 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +52 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.74 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Meshery scores 73/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.
Meshery ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.
If you want the quickest setup, Meshery is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.
Meshery is growing faster right now (+52 stars in 30 days).
glusterfs details →Meshery details →
Swap a project
Keep glusterfs, compare it with
Keep Meshery, compare it with