glusterfsvsjenkins
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| glusterfs | jenkins | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 26 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +117 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 32 |
| Latest release | — | jenkins-2.580.2 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
jenkins scores 82/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.
jenkins ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.
If you want the quickest setup, jenkins is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.
jenkins is growing faster right now (+117 stars in 30 days).
glusterfs details →jenkins details →
Swap a project
Keep glusterfs, compare it with
Keep jenkins, compare it with