globalping-probevsHealthchecks
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| globalping-probe | Healthchecks | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 215 | 10 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +106 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 12 |
| Latest release | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | ISC | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.
globalping-probe ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, globalping-probe is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).
globalping-probe details →Healthchecks details →