globalping-probevsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted Network Monitoring projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| globalping-probe | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 215 | 46 448 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 313 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | ISC | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.
globalping-probe ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
If you want the quickest setup, globalping-probe is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 313 stars in 30 days).
globalping-probe details →mitmproxy details →All Network Monitoring projects →