gitbucketvsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| gitbucket | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 14 in Code Hosting | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 9 418 | 16 176 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | +543 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | 4.48.0 · 20 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Scala | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Vert scores 71/100 against 68/100 for gitbucket, so it is the safer default.
gitbucket ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.
Vert is growing faster right now (+543 stars in 30 days).
gitbucket details →Vert details →