GhostfoliovsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ghostfolio | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 62 in Personal Finance | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 9 597 | 6 048 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 104 | 0 |
| Latest release | 3.94.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Ghostfolio scores 75/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Ghostfolio ships more often: 104 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Ghostfolio is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Ghostfolio is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).
Ghostfolio details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Ghostfolio, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with