GhostvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ghost | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Content Management | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 55 632 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +208 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 | 11 |
| Latest release | v6.73.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Ghost scores 83/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
Ghost ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TypeType.
If you want the quickest setup, Ghost is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
Ghost is growing faster right now (+208 stars in 30 days).
Ghost details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep Ghost, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with