ResourceSpacevsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ResourceSpace | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 142 in Media Management | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | — | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | — | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
ResourceSpace scores 64/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ResourceSpace.
If you want the quickest setup, ResourceSpace is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
ResourceSpace details →TypeType details →