TypeTypevsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TypeType | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #66 of 118 in Media Server | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 471 | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 29 |
| Latest release | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | release-18.3.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | C |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TypeType.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
TypeType details →Umbraco CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep TypeType, compare it with
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with