GeoLensvsMartin Tile Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GeoLens | Martin Tile Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Geospatial | #2 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +92 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 45 |
| Latest release | v1.27.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | python-cog-tiles-v0.1.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Martin Tile Server scores 68/100 against 52/100 for GeoLens, so it is the safer default.
Martin Tile Server ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for GeoLens.
If you want the quickest setup, Martin Tile Server is easier to run; GeoLens needs more configuration.
Martin Tile Server is growing faster right now (+92 stars in 30 days).
GeoLens details →Martin Tile Server details →
Swap a project
Keep GeoLens, compare it with
Keep Martin Tile Server, compare it with