GeoLensvsGraphHopper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GeoLens | GraphHopper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Geospatial | #3 of 7 in Navigation |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 6 748 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +47 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.27.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | 11.1 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
GraphHopper scores 70/100 against 52/100 for GeoLens, so it is the safer default.
GeoLens ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for GraphHopper.
GraphHopper is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).
GeoLens details →GraphHopper details →
Swap a project
Keep GeoLens, compare it with
Keep GraphHopper, compare it with