Forgevslangflow
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Forge | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #153 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 175 | 156 112 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +921 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 |
| Latest release | — | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 43/100 for Forge, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Forge.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Forge needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).
Forge details →langflow details →All AI Agents projects →
Swap a project
Keep Forge, compare it with
Keep langflow, compare it with