FlagsmithvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Flagsmith | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Feature Flags | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 6 630 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +61 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 68 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.288.2 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Flagsmith scores 73/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Flagsmith ships more often: 68 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Flagsmith is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Flagsmith details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Flagsmith, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with