growthbookvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| growthbook | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 8 547 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +122 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, growthbook is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
growthbook details →Tube Archivist details →