Fish SpeechvsHealthchecks
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Healthchecks | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 33 473 | 10 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 | +109 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech and Healthchecks score the same (73/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech details →Healthchecks details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with