HealthchecksvsKokoro FastAPI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Kokoro FastAPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 10 471 | 5 612 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +135 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 14 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.
Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →Kokoro FastAPI details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Kokoro FastAPI, compare it with