Fish SpeechvsHass-MCP
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Hass-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #63 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 33 473 | 352 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.
Hass-MCP ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Hass-MCP is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Hass-MCP details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Hass-MCP, compare it with