Hass-MCPvsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Hass-MCP | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #63 of 104 in Home Automation | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 351 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenReader scores 59/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Hass-MCP.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).
Hass-MCP details →OpenReader details →
Swap a project
Keep Hass-MCP, compare it with
Keep OpenReader, compare it with