firecrawlvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 196 406 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 513 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 3 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
If you want the quickest setup, WhisperLive---CPU is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 513 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with