LightpandavsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lightpanda | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Browser Automation | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 37 107 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +306 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 3 |
| Latest release | 1.0.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Zig | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Lightpanda scores 79/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
Lightpanda ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
If you want the quickest setup, Lightpanda is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.
Lightpanda is growing faster right now (+306 stars in 30 days).
Lightpanda details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep Lightpanda, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with