HuginnvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Huginn | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 50 165 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +181 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Huginn scores 80/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
Huginn ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
Huginn is growing faster right now (+181 stars in 30 days).
Huginn details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep Huginn, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with